Araştırma Makalesi    |    Açık Erişim
Türkiye Üstün Zekalı ve Dahi Çocuklar Eğitim Vakfı Dergisi 2026, Clt. 3(4) 30-63

Bilişsel Asimetri: Üstün Yeteneklilikten İnsan–Yapay Zeka Birlikteliğine

Volkan Duran

ss. 30 - 63   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/tuzdev.2026.1461.2

Yayın Tarihi: Haziran 30, 2026  |   Görüntüleme Sayısı: 0/0   |   İndirilme Sayısı: 0/0


Özet

Özerk ve potansiyel olarak süper zeki yapay zekanın ortaya çıkışı, insanlık tarihinin en önemli sosyokültürel dönüm noktalarından birini temsil edebilir. Mevcut tartışmalar otomasyon, yönetişim ve işgücü dönüşümünü ön plana çıkarırken, daha derin kültürel mesele insanlığın kendi kapasitesini aşabilecek bilişsel biçimlerle karşılaşmasına ilişkindir. Bu makale; bilimsel ve teknolojik baskı altında tarihsel modernleşme, üstün yetenekli bireylerin psikolojisi ve eğitimi ile ajansal yapay zekanın yükselişi olmak üzere genellikle ayrı ayrı incelenen üç alanı birbirine bağlayan kuramsal bir çerçeve geliştirmektedir. Bu bakımdan makale, üstün yetenekliliğin toplumların bilişsel asimetriye nasıl yanıt verdiğini anlamak için insan ölçeğinde bir model sunduğunu öne sürmektedir. Üstün yetenekli bireyler; normatif olarak yapılandırılmış ortamlar içinde sıklıkla asenkron gelişim, maskeleme, sosyal yabancılaşma, yoğunlaşmış ahlaki duyarlılık ve eğitim uyumsuzluğu yaşamaktadır. Bu örüntüler, bilişsel kapasiteleri sıradan insan yeteneklerini aşan yapay ajanlara yönelik gelecekteki insan tepkilerini yorumlamak için kavramsal bir mercek işlevi görebilir. Bu çalışma Osmanlı Tanzimat reformları, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti modernleşmesi ve Japonya'nın Meiji Restorasyonu'ndan yola çıkarak ajansal yapay zekanın yeni bir uygarlık baskısı biçimi yaratabileceğini ileri sürmektedir. Bu baskı, başka bir insan uygarlığından değil, insan-dışı bilişsel sistemlerden kaynaklanacaktır. Makale, toplulukların hâkim insan normlarını aşan ajanlara verdikleri sosyal, etik ve kurumsal yanıtları tanımlamak üzere bilişsel asimetri uyumu kavramını ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuç olarak temel zorluğun yalnızca süper zeki yapay zekayı denetim altına almak değil, insan onurunu, anlamını ve ahlaki sorumluluğunu koruyarak üstün bilişsel biçimlerle birlikte var olabilmek için gerekli kültürel ve etik olgunluğu geliştirmek olduğu vurgulanmaktadır.

Anahtar kelimeler: üstün yeteneklilik, ajanik yapay zeka, süperzeka, bilişsel asimetri, sosyo-kültürel dönüşüm


Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır

APA 7th edition
Duran, V. (2026). Bilişsel Asimetri: Üstün Yeteneklilikten İnsan–Yapay Zeka Birlikteliğine. Türkiye Üstün Zekalı ve Dahi Çocuklar Eğitim Vakfı Dergisi, 3(4), 30-63. https://doi.org/10.29329/tuzdev.2026.1461.2

Harvard
Duran, V. (2026). Bilişsel Asimetri: Üstün Yeteneklilikten İnsan–Yapay Zeka Birlikteliğine. Türkiye Üstün Zekalı ve Dahi Çocuklar Eğitim Vakfı Dergisi, 3(4), pp. 30-63.

Chicago 16th edition
Duran, Volkan (2026). "Bilişsel Asimetri: Üstün Yeteneklilikten İnsan–Yapay Zeka Birlikteliğine". Türkiye Üstün Zekalı ve Dahi Çocuklar Eğitim Vakfı Dergisi 3 (4):30-63. https://doi.org/10.29329/tuzdev.2026.1461.2

Kaynakça

    Abbosh, A., Al‐Anbuky, A., Xue, F., & Mahmoud, S. A. (2025). Perspective on the Role of AI in Shaping Human Cognitive Development. Information, 16(11), 1011–1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16111011

    Acharya, D. B., Kuppan, K., & Divya, B. (2025). Agentic AI: Autonomous Intelligence for Complex Goals—A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access, 13, 18912–18936. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3532853

    Adısönmez, U. C. (2019). When Conflict Traumas Fragment: Investigating the Sociopsychological Roots of Turkey’s Intractable Conflict. Political Psychology, 40(6), 1373–1390. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12631

    Adrian, S. (2025). The Psychological Ceiling of AI Adoption: Why the AI Bubble is a Social Phenomenon, Not a Technical One. In Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). European Organization for Nuclear Research. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17734009

    Aithal, P. S. (2023). Super-Intelligent Machines - Analysis of Developmental Challenges and Predicted Negative Consequences. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters, 109–141. https://doi.org/10.47992/ijaeml.2581.7000.0191

    Aksakal, H. (2015). Japon Ve Türk Modernleşmelerinin Karşılaştırmalı Tarihi Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme Gerçekten “Japon Mucizesi” Vs. “Türk Usûlü” Mü? Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 83-108. https://izlik.org/JA75DS43SW

    Alsop, G. (2003). Asynchrony:Intuitively valid and theoretically reliable. Roeper Review, 25(3), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554213

    Alva, L., & Pandey, B. K. (2026). Agentic AI systems in the age of generative models: architectures, cloud scalability, and real-world applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 59(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11458-6

    Amin, F. (2024). The Typologies of Islamic Thought: Mapping The Contemporary Intellectual Movements in Indonesia. Jurnal THEOLOGIA, 35(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2024.35.1.19551

    Amiri, M. (2024). At a glance of twice-exceptional children on psychological perspective. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 11(3), 131-132. https://izlik.org/JA37JG97DX

    Andoniou, C. (2026). The Überbeıng: Ontologıcal Evolutıon In The Post-Aı Condıtıon. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18405831

    Aras, R. (2019). Veiled memories: an ethnography of the single-party regime in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 56(2), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2019.1680544

    Avcı, Ö. (2015). The Influence Of Culture On The Acquisition Of Turkish People’s Conceptions About Education: A Qualitative Study. Dergipark (Istanbul University). Https://Dergipark.Org.Tr/Tr/Pub/Pesausad/İssue/0/274898

    Avcil, C. (2022). Türkiye Muhafazakârlığında Kadın Tasavvuru: Samiha Ayverdi Örneği Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirme. Current Research in Social Sciences, 8(2), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.30613/curesosc.1103247

    Baldini, R., & Logrieco, M. G. (2024). The Gifted Student: Gifts and Talents Development. Elementa Intersections between Philosophy Epistemology and Empirical Perspectives, 3. https://doi.org/10.7358/elementa-2023-0102-balo

    Beckert, J. (2010). Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Convergence and Divergence in Institutional Change. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01369.x

    Blaas, S. (2014). The Relationship Between Social-Emotional Difficulties and Underachievement of Gifted Students. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2014.1

    Borotschnig, H. (2025). Emotions in Artificial Intelligence. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.01462

    Bosak, B. X. (2026a). Artificial Intelligence and the End of Human Cognitive Isolation: A Cross-Domain Transformation. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19125726

    Bower, M., Torrington, J., Lai, J. W. M., Petocz, P., & Alfano, M. (2024). How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative Artificial Intelligence? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12405-0

    Bryson, J. J. (2018). Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9448-6

    Caviola, L. (2025). The Societal Response to Potentially Sentient AI. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2502.00388

    Çekiç, C. E. (2024). Ottoman Empire-Japan relations before World War I in the Western press. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1521216

    Chaffer, T. J., Goldston, J., & I, G. D. A. T. A. (2024). Incentivized Symbiosis: A Paradigm for Human-Agent Coevolution. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2412.06855

    Chan, C. K. Y., & Colloton, T. (2024). Generative AI in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003459026

    Chandra, J., & Navneet, S. K. (2025). Advancing Responsible Innovation in Agentic AI: A study of Ethical Frameworks for Household Automation. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2507.15901

    Cheng, L., & Gong, X. (2024). Appraising Regulatory Framework Towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) Under Digital Humanism. Deleted Journal. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdlg-2024-0015

    Damar, M., Özen, A., Çakmak, Ü. E., Özoğuz, E., & Erenay, F. S. (2024). Super AI, Generative AI, Narrow AI and Chatbots: An Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for The Public Sector and Public Administration. Journal of AI, 8(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1512906

    Demirbaga, K. K. (2025). Characterizing giftedness through generative Artificial Intelligence: Insights from ChatGPT and Gemini. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/usbed/issue/91777/1735234

    Diederich, J. (2021). The psychology of artificial superintelligence. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71842-8

    Dinler, M. (2017). The Knife’s Edge of the Present: Archaeology in Turkey from the Nineteenth Century to the 1940s. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 22(4), 728–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-017-0446-x

    Dung, L. (2025). The argument for near-term human disempowerment through AI. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01930-2

    Durga, R. K. (2025). Beyond Traditional AI: A Comprehensive Study of Agentic Frameworks and Their Impact. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology., 104–104. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v4i6.1044

    Dwivedi, Y. K., Helal, M. Y., Elgendy, I. A., Alahmad, R., Walton, P., Suh, A., Singh, V., & Jeon, I. (2025). Agentic AI Systems: What It Is and Isn’t. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 45(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.70018

    Džogović, S. A., Zdravkovska-Adamova, B., & Serpil, H. (2024). From Theory to Practice: A Holistic Study of the Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods and Techniques in Higher Education and Science. Journal Human Research in Rehabilitation, 14(2), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.092406

    Engin, Z. (2026). Human-AI Governance (HAIG): A Trust-Utility Approach. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.01651

    Ergin, M., & Shinohara, C. (2021). Neo-Ottomanism and Cool Japan in comparative perspective. New Perspectives on Turkey, 65, 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2021.17

    ERHAN, Ç. (2002). Asian Dimension of Turkey’s Character: An Obstacle or a Catalyst for European Union Membership. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/aacd/issue/50090/642665

    Ertugruloglu, O., Gülcan, N. Y., & Abidoğlu, Ü. P. (2024). The Impact of Culture on the Education System. International E-Journal of Educational Studies, 8(16), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1436091

    Esenbel, S. (2006). Editor’s introduction: Reflections on Japanese and Turkish modernization and global history. New Perspectives on Turkey, 35, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0896634600004453

    Evans, J., Bratton, B. H., & Arcas, B. A. y. (2026). Agentic AI and the next intelligence explosion. Science, 391(6791). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aeg1895

    Farisco, M., Baldassarre, G. D., Cartoni, E., Leach, A. R., Petrovici, M. A., Rosemann, A., Salles, A., Stahl, B. C., & Albada, S. J. van. (2024). A method for the ethical analysis of brain-inspired AI. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10769-4

    Farisco, M., Evers, K., & Salles, A. (2020). Towards Establishing Criteria for the Ethical Analysis of Artificial Intelligence. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(5), 2413–2425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00238-w

    Fei, C. (2026). Social Transformation in the Age of AGI: From Tool Evolution to Institutional Reconstruction. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18452602

    Firdaus, T. (2025). The Philosophical Construction of Educational Science in Relation to Posthumanism and Transhumanism in Artificial Intelligence. Turkish Academic Research Review - Türk Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi [TARR], 10(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1610935

    Frimpong, V. (2025). When Institutions Cannot Keep up with Artificial Intelligence: Expiration Theory and the Risk of Institutional Invalidation. Administrative Sciences, 15(7), 263–263. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15070263

    Gabriel, I., Manzini, A., Keeling, G., Hendricks, L. A., Rieser, V., Iqbal, H., Tomašev, N., Ktena, S. I., Kenton, Z., Rodríguez, M. B., El-Sayed, S., Brown, S., Akbulut, C., Trask, A., Hughes, E., Bergman, A. S., Shelby, R., Marchal, N., Griffin, C., … Manyika, J. (2024). The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2404.16244

    Gardner, J. P., & Baulin, V. A. (2025). Is the `Agent’ Paradigm a Limiting Framework for Next-Generation Intelligent Systems? arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2509.10875

    garg, vinita. (2025). Designing the Mind: How Agentic Frameworks Are Shaping the Future of AI Behavior. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(5), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2025.7.5.24

    Gill, K. S. (2020). AI&Society: editorial volume 35.2: the trappings of AI Agency. AI & Society, 35(2), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00961-9

    Global Sceptical Publics. (2022). In UCL Press eBooks. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781800083448

    Göksu, D. Y., Göksu, S., & Kocaman, C. (2024). Türki̇ye Bağlamında Üstün Yetenekli̇ Öğrenci̇leri̇n Sosyo-Duygusal Geli̇şi̇mi̇ ve Eği̇ti̇me Etki̇leri̇. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/neueefd/issue/85923/1563729

    Guilbault, K. M., Leithauser, H., & Genheimer, K. (2025). Using the ElemenOE with parents to identify Dąbrowskian overexcitabilities among precocious children. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15395909

    Guthrie, K. (2019). “Nothing is ever easy”: Parent Perceptions of Intensity in Their Gifted Adolescent Children. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3598

    Hermann, E. (2021). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Marketing for Social Good—An Ethical Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04843-y

    Hernández-Espinosa, A., Abrahão, F. S., Witkowski, O., & Zenil, H. (2025). Neurodivergent Influenceability as a Contingent Solution to the AI Alignment Problem. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.02581

    Hu, B. A., & Rong, H. (2025). On the Day They Experience: Awakening Self-Sovereign Experiential AI Agents. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.14893

    Huang, C., Chen, Y., Jin, H., Stringham, M., Liu, C., & Oliver, C. (2020). Mindfulness, Life Skills, Resilience, and Emotional and Behavioral Problems for Gifted Low-Income Adolescents in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00594

    Hudson, A. D., Finn, E., & Wylie, R. (2021). What can science fiction tell us about the future of artificial intelligence policy? AI & Society, 38(1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01273-2

    Humm, P. (2026). The Ontological Rupture: Superintelligence and the Transformation of Human Agency. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18741638

    Ignacio, R. C., José. (2024). Giftedness and double exceptionality: identification, support and development. Dialnet (Universidad de La Rioja). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=10458628

    Iseko, A. (2025). Rethinking Intelligence Power and Epistemic Authority in the Age of Superhuman AI. International Journal of Science Technology and Society, 13(4), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251304.14

    Ishaiger, M. A. A. (2026). The Global Reformation Revisited: Artificial Intelligence, Authority, and Cycles of Legitimacy in the Twenty-First Century. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT), 271–271. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb167

    Iyigun, M., & Rubin, J. (2017a). The Ideological Roots of Institutional Change. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2946383

    Iyigun, M., & Rubin, J. (2017b). The Ideological Roots of Institutional Change. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10703

    Iyigun, M., Rubin, J., & Seror, A. (2021). A theory of cultural revivals. European Economic Review, 135, 103734–103734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103734

    Jahar, A. S., & Shodiq, S. (2022). SOCIAL AND RELIGIOUS DIMENSIONS OF CHILDREN’S INHERITANCE IN TURKEY, SAUDI ARABIA AND INDONESIA. MIQOT Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v46i1.870

    Janhonen, J. (2023). Socialisation approach to AI value acquisition: enabling flexible ethical navigation with built-in receptiveness to social influence. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00372-8

    Jiang, Y., Li, X., Luo, H., Yin, S., & Kaynak, O. (2022). Quo vadis artificial intelligence? Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00022-8

    Karataş, İ. (2025). The Impact of Self-Orientalism on Türkiye’s Foreign Policy Towards the Middle East. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://doi.org/10.21600/ijoks.1749306

    Kartal, E., Özyaprak, M., Özen, Z., Şimşek, İ., Biber, S. K., Biber, M., & Can, T. (2020). Asking the Right Questions to Nominate A Student as Gifted and Talented: A Machine Learning Approach. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 13(4), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.17671/gazibtd.591158

    Kaya, E. E. (2025). BENZERLİKLERİ VE FARKLILIKLARI İLE TÜRK-JAPON MODERNLEŞME SÜREÇLERİ. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi/Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitisü Dergisi, 49, 407–435. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.1613361

    Kaya, Y. (2025). The Closure of Darulfunun and Initiatives for Transmitting Religious Values During the Gap Years in Religious Education. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kider/issue/92902/1662083

    Kiškis, M. (2023). Legal framework for the coexistence of humans and conscious AI [Review of Legal framework for the coexistence of humans and conscious AI]. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6. Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1205465

    Korinek, A. (2024). Economic Policy Challenges for the Age of AI. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2409.13168

    Korteling, J. E., Boer-Visschedijk, G. C. van de, Blankendaal, R., Boonekamp, R., & Eikelboom, A. R. (2021). Human- versus Artificial Intelligence [Review of Human- versus Artificial Intelligence]. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4. Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.622364

    Kulveit, J., Douglas, R., Ammann, N., Turan, D., Krueger, D. M., & Duvenaud, D. (2025). Gradual Disempowerment: Systemic Existential Risks from Incremental AI Development. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2501.16946

    Kurian, N. (2025). Where are the children? The missing piece of AI ethics. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02609-y

    Küçük, Y. (1990a) Aydın Üzerine Tezler 1, Tekin Yayınevi

    Küçük, Y. (1990b) Aydın Üzerine Tezler 2, Tekin Yayınevi

    Küçük, Y. (1990c) Aydın Üzerine Tezler 3, Tekin Yayınevi

    Levent, F., & BAŞ, Ş. (2022). The Opinions of Teachers Regarding the Character Development and Character Education of Gifted Students. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 23(4), 911–930. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.951346

    Levin, M. (2022). Generalizing frameworks for sentience beyond natural species. Animal Sentience, 7(32). https://doi.org/10.51291/2377-7478.1733

    Li, O. (2024). Should we develop AGI? Artificial suffering and the moral development of humans. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00411-4

    Li, Y. (2025). The Future of Education and Its Role in Promoting Human Skills in an AI World. In CSMFL Publications eBooks (pp. 53–67). https://doi.org/10.46679/9788196780586ch06

    List, C. (2021). Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1213–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00454-7

    Lobo, J., & Ser, J. D. (2024). Can transformative AI shape a new age for our civilization?: Navigating between speculation and reality. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2412.08273

    Luckin, R. (2024). Nurturing human intelligence in the age of AI: rethinking education for the future. Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal, 39(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-04-2024-0108

    Makrehchi, M. (2025). Three Lenses on the AI Revolution: Risk, Transformation, Continuity. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.12859

    Mamak, K. (2024). AGI crimes? The role of criminal law in mitigating existential risks posed by artificial general intelligence. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02036-5

    Mambetalina, A., Nurkeshov, T., Satanov, A., Karkulova, A., & Nurtazanov, E. (2023). Designing a methodological system for the development and support of gifted and motivated students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1098989

    Matta, D. (2026). The AI Zeitgeist Framework: Historical Evolution and Anthropological Scenarios in the Age of Cognitive Offloading. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19059340

    Metin, Ö., & Gelbal, O. (2008). The Path to Modern Turkish Law. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/abr/issue/47977/607002

    Molotokienė, E. (2019). Rethinking Radical Imagination: Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2019.7.3.11

    Mouta, A., Sánchez, E. M. T., & Llorente, A. M. P. (2023). Design of a future scenarios toolkit for an ethical implementation of artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 10473–10498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12229-y

    Mukherjee, A., & Chang, H. H. (2025). Agentic AI: Autonomy, Accountability, and the Algorithmic Society. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2502.00289

    Muñoz, F. (2024). The coevolution of technology, markets, and culture: the challenging case of AI. Review of Evolutionary Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-024-00126-0

    Murugesan, S. (2025). The Rise of Agentic AI: Implications, Concerns, and the Path Forward. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 40(2), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2025.3544940

    Nordhaus, W. D. (2021). Are We Approaching an Economic Singularity? Information Technology and the Future of Economic Growth. American Economic Journal Macroeconomics, 13(1), 299–332. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20170105

    Nossal, N. (2026). Civ 2.0: Structural Limits of Human Governance and the Prospects of AI-Mediated Civilizational Transition. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18172479

    Oman, D., Gabrijelčič, M. K., & Kiswarday, V. (2025). Identifying and Supporting Twice-Exceptional Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Perspectives of Primary School Teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 18(4), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18425a

    Onbasi, E. P. (2025). Abdurresid Ibrahim and Meiji Japan: A Muslim Intellectual’s Encounter with Non-Western Modernization. AL-ITQAN JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC SCIENCES AND COMPARATIVE STUDIES, 10(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.31436/alitqan.v10i2.346

    Oosthuizen, J. H. (2024). Applying the Triarchic Theory of Cognitive Disposition in AI stewardship. South African Journal of Business Management, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v55i1.4363

    Papadopoulos, D. (2020). Psychological Framework for Gifted Children’s Cognitive and Socio-Emotional Development: A Review of the Research Literature and Implications [Review of Psychological Framework for Gifted Children’s Cognitive and Socio-Emotional Development: A Review of the Research Literature and Implications]. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 305–323. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.666308

    Peterson, J. S., Assouline, S. G., & Jen, E. (2021). Responding to Concerns Related to the Social and Emotional Development of Gifted Adolescents (pp. 65–90). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003238829-4

    Polyportis, A., & Pahos, N. (2024). Navigating the perils of artificial intelligence: a focused review on ChatGPT and responsible research and innovation [Review of Navigating the perils of artificial intelligence: a focused review on ChatGPT and responsible research and innovation]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02464-6

    R, W. V., & C, L. K. (2020). How Can We Better Understand, Identify, and Support Highly Gifted and Profoundly Gifted Students? A Literature Review of the Psychological Development of Highly-Profoundly Gifted Individuals and Overexcitabilities [Review of How Can We Better Understand, Identify, and Support Highly Gifted and Profoundly Gifted Students? A Literature Review of the Psychological Development of Highly-Profoundly Gifted Individuals and Overexcitabilities]. Annals of Cognitive Science, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.36959/447/348

    Ramamonjisoa, D. (2025). The Intertwined Fates of Human and Artificial Agents: Navigating the Evolving Landscape of LLM-Driven Agents. Glovento Journal of Integrated Studies, 1(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.63665/gjis.v1.17

    Rawas, S. (2024). AI: the future of humanity. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00118-3

    Reis-Jorge, J., Ferreira, M., Olcina‐Sempere, G., & Marques, B. S. (2021). Perceptions of Giftedness and Classroom Practice with Gifted Children – an Exploratory Study of Primary School Teachers. Qualitative Research in Education, 10(3), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.8097

    Resnik, D. B., & Hosseini, M. (2024). The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8

    Rodrigues, F. de A. A., Alves, J. M., & Marchetti, R. L. (2026). BRILLIANT MINDS, LONELY HEARTS: THE CHALLENGE OF HIGH INTELLIGENCE IN SOCIETY. International Journal of Health Science, 6(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.15956326020314

    Rosselet, J. G., & Stauffer, S. D. (2013). Using group role-playing games with gifted children and adolescents: A psychosocial intervention model. International Journal of Play Therapy, 22(4), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034557

    S, D. L. (2025). Rebranding empire in the age of generative AI. Frontiers in Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1604361

    Sahin, M. B. (2025). Dual Despotisms: Young Ottoman Anticolonial Thinkers and Projects of Global Integration (1889-1908). Deep Blue (University of Michigan). https://doi.org/10.7302/27002

    Samuel, Y., Brennan‐Tonetta, M., Samuel, J., Kashyap, R., Kumar, V., Kaashyap, S. K., Chidipothu, N., Anand, I., & Jain, P. (2023). Cultivation of human centered artificial intelligence: culturally adaptive thinking in education (CATE) for AI. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1198180

    Sandri, P., Zanetti, M. A., & Bennardi, I. (2023). Gifted Students and Inclusive Distance Learning: an Exploratory Survey. Form Re - Open Journal per La Formazione in Rete, 23(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.36253/form-14189

    Saracini, C., Cornejo-Plaza, M. I., & Cippitani, R. (2025). Techno-emotional projection in human–GenAI relationships: a psychological and ethical conceptual perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1662206

    Saranlı, A. G., & Metin, N. (2012). Social-emotional problems observed in gifted children. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1501/egifak_0000001239

    Sasin, M. (2023). The Gifted Student in the Post-Pandemic Situation. Nauki o Wychowaniu Studia Interdyscyplinarne, 16(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.18778/2450-4491.16.05

    Schopenhauer, A. (1974). Parerga and Paralipomena: Short Philosophical Essays (E. F. J. Payne, Çev.). Oxford University Press. (Orijinal eserin yayımlanma tarihi 1851).

    Schwerzmann, K., & Campolo, A. (2025). “Desired behaviors”: alignment and the emergence of a machine learning ethics. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02272-3

    Sharma, Dr. A. K. (2026). Agentic AI: The Evolution of Autonomous Decision-Making Systems and Architectural Paradigms. In Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). European Organization for Nuclear Research. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18787351

    Shaughnessy, M. F. (2023). An interview with Dr. Matt Zakreski. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jgedc/issue/76571/1320781

    Shehu, A. (2026). Beyond the Singularity Myth: Artificial General Intelligence as Cumulative Infrastructural Transformation—Absorption Capacity, Epistemic Drift, and the Erosion of Human Verification Power. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 17(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3779133

    Shehzadi, I., Vrba, J., Sajin, S. K., & Xabibullayevich, S. S. (2025). Interdisciplinary Insights. In Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series (pp. 43–62). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-4621-2.ch003

    Sibai, N. Ahmed, Y., Sibaee, S., AlHalawani, S., Ammar, A., & Boulila, W. (2026). The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2601.02749

    Silverman, L. K. (1998). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.1997.9681865

    Song, S.-Y. (2016). Education Policy in Periods of Modernization: A Comparison of Turkey and South Korea. US-China Education Review B, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6248/2016.06.005

    Sonko, S., Adewusi, A. O., Chimezie, O., Onwusinkwue, S., & Atadoga, A. (2024). A critical review towards artificial general intelligence: Challenges, ethical considerations, and the path forward [Review of A critical review towards artificial general intelligence: Challenges, ethical considerations, and the path forward]. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(3), 1262–1268. GSC Online Press. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.3.0817

    Sternberg, R. J. (2025). Reconsidering What It Means to Be “Gifted” in the Age of AI. Gifted Education International. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294251371557

    Sternberg, R. J. (2026). Does AI increase cognitive abilities, decrease them, or a little bit of each? And what are its implications for identification and development of the gifted? Frontiers in Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1759062

    Tadimalla, S. Y., & Maher, M. L. (2024). Implications of Identity of AI: Creators, Creations, and Consequences. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2403.07924

    Takata, H. (2026). Non-linear Cognition and Subjective Pain in Gifted Individuals A Structural Framework for Understanding Maladaptation and Budding. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18327745

    Tatlı, C. E. (2017). Investigating of the subjective well-being of gifted adolescents. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(4), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v4i4.2595

    Tercan, H., & Bıçakçı, M. Y. (2022). Exploring the link between Turkish gifted children’s perceptions of the gifted label and emotional intelligence competencies. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17966-7

    Tombuş, H. E., & Aygenç, B. (2017). (Post-)Kemalist Secularism in Turkey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 19(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2016.1201995

    Toprak, B. (2006). Economic Development versus Cultural Transformation: Projects of Modernity in Japan and Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 35, 85–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0896634600004490

    Ungureanu, V. (2025). The 3x2A Strategy for Societal Adaptation in the GenAI Era: A Framework for Human-AI Synergy. Computer Science Journal of Moldova, 33(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.56415/csjm.v33.14

    Varypaiev, O., Hhumeniuk, S., Котун, К., Volskyi, D., & Vernudina, I. (2025). AI Philosophy: Challenges to Man’s Identity and Moral Norms. International Journal on Culture History and Religion, 7, 242–255. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7isi1.194

    Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3

    Watters, S. W. (2018). Developments in AKP Policy Toward Religion and Homogeneity. German Law Journal, 19(2), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200022720

    Yiğit, S., & Doğan, T. (2024). Çocuklar İçin Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeğinin Psikometrik ve Bazı Demografik Özelliklerinin Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerde İncelenmesi. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cuefd/issue/85968/1471710

    Yıldırım, Ö., & Çelikkol, A. K. (2023). Investigation of the Resilience, Self-Efficacy, and Perceived Social Support of Gifted Students. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 25(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1195044

    Zhou, J. (2023). Higher Expectations of Artificial Intelligence in Terms of Morality and Humanity. Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences, 20, 279–284. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v20i.11680